Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-08 20:10:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E45DDF2552C38F3E0E962D7DB7445410B9C15F32F0E87E673FAF4433306BD76
Participant Details

Original Note:

Chad Loder’s account was recently reinstated, among others who had their original bans reversed. This new ban, specifically for ban evasion, looks suspicious given the context of Loder’s research.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1596870966088450050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E45DDF2552C38F3E0E962D7DB7445410B9C15F32F0E87E673FAF4433306BD76
  • createdAtMillis - 1670530225993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15968709660884500502E45DDF2552C38F3E0E962D7DB7445410B9C15F32F0E87E673FAF4433306BD76