Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-23 08:00:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55EADF6D0940D598C47B69E3478A5AD41283FBF4F3A353C3AB6D1DD91B7CB8C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unfortunately this is so crazy there isn't a direct fact checking link to include here. But we have this - Judicial Watch has 100% NON factual rating. https://www.politifact.com/personalities/judicial-watch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594988755638636545
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55EADF6D0940D598C47B69E3478A5AD41283FBF4F3A353C3AB6D1DD91B7CB8C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1669190439847
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159498875563863654555EADF6D0940D598C47B69E3478A5AD41283FBF4F3A353C3AB6D1DD91B7CB8C9