Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 22:07:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7040A32B230289843A3CF8C208D48AE9FD76C9C33220E1FA2CC12DAD22BF6E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Justice Barrett has been "urged" to recuse by some members of the public, no motion to recuse has been filed with the United States Supreme Court, according to the docket of the case: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-476.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594800666266009606
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7040A32B230289843A3CF8C208D48AE9FD76C9C33220E1FA2CC12DAD22BF6E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1669068479996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594800666266009606F7040A32B230289843A3CF8C208D48AE9FD76C9C33220E1FA2CC12DAD22BF6E4