Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 21:30:28 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A397A363B751D3EE8DC441126BE3E1752DE640FF1198A0C3CD4B116D0A390BC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no proof that any government investigation would be retaliation. It's not "retaliatory" to investigate the acquisition of a publicly traded company, with the assistance of foreign money, to take it off the stock market. That's standard procedure. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-national-security-grounds-for-investigating-musks-twitter-acquisition/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594751540794900480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A397A363B751D3EE8DC441126BE3E1752DE640FF1198A0C3CD4B116D0A390BC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1669066228961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594751540794900480A397A363B751D3EE8DC441126BE3E1752DE640FF1198A0C3CD4B116D0A390BC7