Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-22 19:04:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83C4BCCF2FF13A59E824401513C36CA859CB0514CDA1C5A1780C08500724FCFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 2018 paper in the article states that what it shows is "not statistical proof," and does not demonstrate predictive properties like constraining location. More recent research finds that remote triggering is rare and that the methods in the 2018 paper are incomplete: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-60988-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594750606559920128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83C4BCCF2FF13A59E824401513C36CA859CB0514CDA1C5A1780C08500724FCFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1669143849800
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159475060655992012883C4BCCF2FF13A59E824401513C36CA859CB0514CDA1C5A1780C08500724FCFD