Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-22 19:19:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EB967637AAFB0CEA879091BFB5757A2652EB11E408E2128BB816776444292BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 2018 paper in the article states that what it shows is "not statistical proof," and does not demonstrate predictive properties like constraining location. More recent research finds that remote triggering is rare and that the methods in the 2018 paper are incomplete: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-60988-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594750606559920128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EB967637AAFB0CEA879091BFB5757A2652EB11E408E2128BB816776444292BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1669144751272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15947506065599201287EB967637AAFB0CEA879091BFB5757A2652EB11E408E2128BB816776444292BA