Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 05:48:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6CECDC844D3E810783CEE40D22EDA1CBFC57A8A930B14625F059760970F3160D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first part is likely meant to be the poster's opinion. The second is accurate. The tweet doesn't imply that the votes were literally 'bought,' only that the goal of bringing so many far right figures into the justices' social circles was to influence outcomes of SCOTUS cases.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594387878217383939
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6CECDC844D3E810783CEE40D22EDA1CBFC57A8A930B14625F059760970F3160D
  • createdAtMillis - 1669009730035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15943878782173839396CECDC844D3E810783CEE40D22EDA1CBFC57A8A930B14625F059760970F3160D