Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 02:01:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9221B792A85CF924239EEB7599FA20FB792900CE3FC6D0C333AC675DB11CE2A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article in question presents zero evidence to the facts outlined. What is presented is a singular testimony of a partisan contact. The NYT even states they could not subsequently find corroborating evidence to support the singular testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594337310874689538
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9221B792A85CF924239EEB7599FA20FB792900CE3FC6D0C333AC675DB11CE2A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1668996118572
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15943373108746895389221B792A85CF924239EEB7599FA20FB792900CE3FC6D0C333AC675DB11CE2A4