Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 05:09:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article in question presents zero evidence to the facts outlined. What is presented is a singular testimony of a partisan contact. The NYT even states they could not subsequently find corroborating evidence to support the singular testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594337310874689538
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120
  • createdAtMillis - 1669007378377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15943373108746895384386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120