Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 09:02:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article, taken at its face value, neither states Alito leaked the Dobbs decision, nor that there was a quid pro quo involving "securing their votes". https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/19/us/supreme-court-leak-abortion-roe-wade.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594115600665673729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1669021332201
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594115600665673729481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB