Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 21:06:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80232866A85A464C6FE74E4DB3291655244FB5C53AF3C31BA3440BB67B7E1C52
Participant Details

Original Note:

Originalism "All statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified." It is an objective interpretation of the Constitution. His claims of corruption are not supported by any evidence https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/white-papers/on-originalism-in-constitutional-interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594072395555475459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80232866A85A464C6FE74E4DB3291655244FB5C53AF3C31BA3440BB67B7E1C52
  • createdAtMillis - 1668978383019
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159407239555547545980232866A85A464C6FE74E4DB3291655244FB5C53AF3C31BA3440BB67B7E1C52