Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-19 22:38:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E18B1FE9F0F1B2B551B9D4FE1A98D05EE2EE2A16D744058679F0B7ECAD2F43A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Interesting Twitter poll, context absent, have the terms of service changed since the violation? If not, why would you even consider it? No lawsuits against the suspension have succeeded, seems it shouldn't be decided by the users, let the TOS prevail.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594064583840464898
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E18B1FE9F0F1B2B551B9D4FE1A98D05EE2EE2A16D744058679F0B7ECAD2F43A
  • createdAtMillis - 1668897481867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15940645838404648989E18B1FE9F0F1B2B551B9D4FE1A98D05EE2EE2A16D744058679F0B7ECAD2F43A