Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-24 03:09:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original tweet is a reporter reporting what sources have told him. While the claim is not publicly verifiable, there's no indication it is false. The current "context" shown implies this was probably not a firing, but the evidence linked doesn't support that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594045763554004992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D
  • createdAtMillis - 1671851391788
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15940457635540049924270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D