Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-18 17:51:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DE022887FF8A3906DCB30B64DCB7923A6377257D4A6DA1C8EC55A44EC00E790
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter does not meet any standard or definition of open-source news or open source journalism as the platform is not open-source for news development (that team no longer exists and their GitHub is unmonitored) nor does "Twitter" land on singular while evolving content. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_journalism https://opensource.twitter.dev/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1593636643625369601
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2DE022887FF8A3906DCB30B64DCB7923A6377257D4A6DA1C8EC55A44EC00E790
createdAtMillis - 1668793906532
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 15936366436253696012DE022887FF8A3906DCB30B64DCB7923A6377257D4A6DA1C8EC55A44EC00E790