Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-16 20:58:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 005A46B4B9959392D6F8629AB6CB9E517CA489B0FAD6963B9147EE113D1C35C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter does not meet any standard or definition of open-source news or open source journalism as the platform is not open-source for news development (that team no longer exists and their GitHub is unmonitored) nor does "Twitter" land on singular while evolving content. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_journalism https://opensource.twitter.dev/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1593636643625369601
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 005A46B4B9959392D6F8629AB6CB9E517CA489B0FAD6963B9147EE113D1C35C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1673902731703
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1593636643625369601005A46B4B9959392D6F8629AB6CB9E517CA489B0FAD6963B9147EE113D1C35C4