Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-14 15:13:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E572A468061299A2B77ED7DB0E79CD0E805AA4CFF1123D7229EC52369D33502
Participant Details

Original Note:

I checked 'Other' because the Note here, while it cites sources, is extending the scope of the discussion rather than addressing an error in the Tweet. I believe the Note should have been posted as a reply. This is a judgement call of mine, not something I can cite sources for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1592115186550411266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E572A468061299A2B77ED7DB0E79CD0E805AA4CFF1123D7229EC52369D33502
  • createdAtMillis - 1668438787690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15921151865504112664E572A468061299A2B77ED7DB0E79CD0E805AA4CFF1123D7229EC52369D33502