Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-14 13:07:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C04F290CEA4EC76745B855F4803A6533DF098AFA71623582A6E2232593A1E748
Participant Details

Original Note:

While Twitter's SEC-required financial statements do not include a separate category for food, it is inherently implausible that Twitter spent $400 per meal served. The former head of food service's estimate of $20-25 dollar per meal is inherently more plausible. https://twitter.com/_hawko/status/1591909771124539393

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1591950954617835520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C04F290CEA4EC76745B855F4803A6533DF098AFA71623582A6E2232593A1E748
  • createdAtMillis - 1668431253235
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1591950954617835520C04F290CEA4EC76745B855F4803A6533DF098AFA71623582A6E2232593A1E748