Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-13 15:40:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4015AC56B02B75ADDC5D36D916B8D7FA1682E5858870776D4728D1D1E2F29CA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific basis for earthquake predictions. There is always a chance for earthquakes in areas with active faults, but specific predictions like this perform no better than random when tested. More from scientists: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes User's history of pseudoscience claims: https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1591655616518696960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4015AC56B02B75ADDC5D36D916B8D7FA1682E5858870776D4728D1D1E2F29CA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1668354051688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15916556165186969604015AC56B02B75ADDC5D36D916B8D7FA1682E5858870776D4728D1D1E2F29CA8