Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-09 20:22:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E00CC883E7E05FCBE00A08B94D0328601FA53FCA9F5DCA97FB5DB0152134B5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Birdwatch is not contentious. That is opinion presented as fact. It provides additional context to tweets that journalists and fact checkers driven by political or ideological bias otherwise ignore.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1590364408777089024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E00CC883E7E05FCBE00A08B94D0328601FA53FCA9F5DCA97FB5DB0152134B5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1668025348943
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15903644087770890246E00CC883E7E05FCBE00A08B94D0328601FA53FCA9F5DCA97FB5DB0152134B5F