Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 19:07:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

While many prefer "Birdwatch" and the goofy avian nicknames provided to its contributors, a subjective statement can't be regarded as "true" or "false". In addition, the clear hyperbole used in the Tweet can't reasonably be expected to mislead other Twitter users. https://twitter.github.io/birdwatch/writing-notes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589651729305444352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1667848041618
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 158965172930544435216883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0