Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 15:32:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9748790244C1DA5149028FD1D295758481A6FE459BC995EA687AD3F1237402FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) would not be able to codify Roe V Wade protections from a congressional standpoint. The law itself was overturned by the Supreme Court and would take that body to overturn any ruling. https://www.heritage.org/life/commentary/womens-health-protection-act-unconstitutional-and-more-radical-roe-v-wade

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589636224943149056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9748790244C1DA5149028FD1D295758481A6FE459BC995EA687AD3F1237402FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1667835161193
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15896362249431490569748790244C1DA5149028FD1D295758481A6FE459BC995EA687AD3F1237402FA