Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 05:28:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 349D2D3A2D0B9A5C6A5B997F43C4DB4FFDC9B37D07CEA89DC4E53056AF5111A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

arbiter of the entertainer and her access to platform doesn’t seem appropriate. It shows a capricious and callous regard for her livelihood with an ex post facto ruling.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589457072332079106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 349D2D3A2D0B9A5C6A5B997F43C4DB4FFDC9B37D07CEA89DC4E53056AF5111A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1667798924141
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1589457072332079106349D2D3A2D0B9A5C6A5B997F43C4DB4FFDC9B37D07CEA89DC4E53056AF5111A0