Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 04:41:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5B1E48F6F7A4F169F6DF1DE4DD9B28F3FB54B3F5AD6BA9B5A8CA1C21964A7F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court has held that works of parody need not be explicitly labeled. The Onion's recent amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court argues this as well. Since usernames are easily seen on Twitter, it's likely that a "reasonable person" would discern the parody.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589409355274850304
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5B1E48F6F7A4F169F6DF1DE4DD9B28F3FB54B3F5AD6BA9B5A8CA1C21964A7F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1667796071264
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1589409355274850304C5B1E48F6F7A4F169F6DF1DE4DD9B28F3FB54B3F5AD6BA9B5A8CA1C21964A7F7