Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 08:56:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court has held that works of parody need not be explicitly labeled. The Onion's recent amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court argues this as well. Since usernames are easily seen on Twitter, it's likely that a "reasonable person" would discern the parody.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589409355274850304
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1667811419639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1589409355274850304481BF0C6C4A9029E0F8A5BB41A4CE8540BAF0A9459E7C8F48D82313AC08624EB