Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-07 00:57:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The purpose of Birdwatch is to fight misinformation, not to argue personal opinions. This tweet is a subjective opinion, and disagreements would be best directed to replies or quote retweets. Notes should avoid argumentative language. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2021/introducing-birdwatch-a-community-based-approach-to-misinformation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1589397182167150592
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9
createdAtMillis - 1667782651588
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1589397182167150592F9E09A77CCB3ACE4BC6A35604E8D07D4612E7FF9E1545AE12332D46F47DCB2C9