Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-06 03:56:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F03FC16C6612BD9397E3B5FE79141E4812547A1DECE561FA56E2FBD2498172E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

While it disappeared,this does not imply it was removed. Users are able to vote on whether the fact-checks are helpful. They can appear or disappear based on how many people found them to be helpful, Twitter's VP of Product Keith Coleman said,which is clearly stated in article https://twitter.github.io/birdwatch/notes-on-twitter/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1589095136352505857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F03FC16C6612BD9397E3B5FE79141E4812547A1DECE561FA56E2FBD2498172E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1667707016744
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1589095136352505857F03FC16C6612BD9397E3B5FE79141E4812547A1DECE561FA56E2FBD2498172E3