Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-06 07:07:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Birdwatch / Community notes allows people to leave notes on Tweets. For a tweet to be seen by the public it needs to get wide support from different groups on Twitter. This means political disinformation generally goes unchallenged. https://techpolicy.press/researchers-explore-partisanship-in-twitter-crowdsourced-fact-checking-program-birdwatch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1588965624209756160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1667718433454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1588965624209756160EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7