Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-05 18:52:21 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 919A014E6E578917A31EDE6D07B8E009D23640CAFB5AA9EFC50B1848739B942F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Birdwatch / Community notes allows people to leave notes on Tweets. For a tweet to be seen by the public it needs to get wide support from different groups on Twitter. This means political disinformation generally goes unchallenged. https://techpolicy.press/researchers-explore-partisanship-in-twitter-crowdsourced-fact-checking-program-birdwatch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1588965624209756160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 919A014E6E578917A31EDE6D07B8E009D23640CAFB5AA9EFC50B1848739B942F
  • createdAtMillis - 1667674341669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1588965624209756160919A014E6E578917A31EDE6D07B8E009D23640CAFB5AA9EFC50B1848739B942F