Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-04 17:22:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E0788AD810050418BBEDAFD2481E90904248E2538D9D4DF90E461C3C37604C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other Birdwatch note on this Tweet is correct — but it may be more accurate to state that there is no “vote” among Birdwatch contributors. The formula isn’t democracy or majority rule, but rather consensus. If enough different people rate it Helpful, it becomes visible. https://twitter.github.io/birdwatch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1588530626138980355
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E0788AD810050418BBEDAFD2481E90904248E2538D9D4DF90E461C3C37604C
  • createdAtMillis - 1667582551710
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 158853062613898035504E0788AD810050418BBEDAFD2481E90904248E2538D9D4DF90E461C3C37604C