Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-03 05:45:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other birdwatch note on this tweet is an example of argumentum ad logicam. The conclusion Mr. Musk draws is correct regardless of how you view his argument. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587969775573123074
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1667454322452
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587969775573123074788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF