Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 08:15:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was the same federal judge, Michael T. Liburdi, who issued orders in both cases. On October 28, Liburdi denied a request to issue a Temporary Restraining Order https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-10-28-032-TRO-Denial12.pdf On Nov 1, he issued a limited restraining order that was jointly pre-negotiated & agreed-to by both parties https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/D.-Ariz.-22-cv-01823-dckt-000051_000-filed-2022-11-01.pdf https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-11-01-047-Defendants-Bench-Brief-Re-Remaining-Areas-of-Disagreement-and-Notice-of-Proposed-Form-of-Order-1.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587680610142797824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445
  • createdAtMillis - 1667376948712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587680610142797824E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445