Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 17:08:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the 1st Amendment does not contain exclusions, case law allows the government to punish inflammatory speech that is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action" (e.g. a riot) (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969) https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587632634175180801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1667408916438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587632634175180801F46CE6BBEB39E4B1CEC954A8AEEDA9E8D5CA2FF12AC412352072D3C39A8E93C1