Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 17:46:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD3F54D83C6FA1A8C41B4D4A52B79BDEB0A8FD2EC730925B4358793D38AA0EF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the 1st Amendment does not contain exclusions, case law allows the government to punish inflammatory speech that is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action" (e.g. a riot) (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969) https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587632634175180801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD3F54D83C6FA1A8C41B4D4A52B79BDEB0A8FD2EC730925B4358793D38AA0EF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1667411169754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587632634175180801CD3F54D83C6FA1A8C41B4D4A52B79BDEB0A8FD2EC730925B4358793D38AA0EF1