Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 05:10:42 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF54BC1F87FB1CC34EA514CEDE1F77BBAED4FC43450C3ADCEB9C3AA8CDB928E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the 1st Amendment does not contain exclusions, case law allows the government to punish inflammatory speech that is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action" (e.g. a riot) (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969) https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587632634175180801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF54BC1F87FB1CC34EA514CEDE1F77BBAED4FC43450C3ADCEB9C3AA8CDB928E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1667365842639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1587632634175180801AF54BC1F87FB1CC34EA514CEDE1F77BBAED4FC43450C3ADCEB9C3AA8CDB928E5