Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 16:54:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E731B2C9D8A54E610C3424057B4FEEAA5C88FFA61B4ED53185FDE292386306D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the 1st Amendment does not contain exclusions, case law allows the government to punish inflammatory speech that is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action" (e.g. a riot) (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969) https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587632634175180801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E731B2C9D8A54E610C3424057B4FEEAA5C88FFA61B4ED53185FDE292386306D
  • createdAtMillis - 1667408069935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15876326341751808018E731B2C9D8A54E610C3424057B4FEEAA5C88FFA61B4ED53185FDE292386306D