Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-02 01:04:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA3A78966BE21682808D6982A011A320A238E7C5A6B25161F425528A7A53C0EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gertz is posting a picture of Birdwatch, which is made up of Twitter community members and posing it as Twitter employees. This is not Twitter oversight or the 15 people mentioned in the tweet. The tweet is false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1587607897973805056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA3A78966BE21682808D6982A011A320A238E7C5A6B25161F425528A7A53C0EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1667351073175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1587607897973805056DA3A78966BE21682808D6982A011A320A238E7C5A6B25161F425528A7A53C0EF