Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-30 17:34:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C16F4807033B0D54910FB2C241A61601
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of this piece (from an alt-weekly) cites con authoritative sources, and stokes conspiracy tones with “I might disappear for reporting this.” His second graf starts with “IMHO.” And his news peg is simply “some on social media are skeptical.” Link is pure opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586763518556135430
  • participantId - C16F4807033B0D54910FB2C241A61601
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1667151268818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1586763518556135430C16F4807033B0D54910FB2C241A61601