Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-30 17:48:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28A18CF3B34A269C073B44AC7F9D343CA758F314B7E11917387EC711C8947289
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of this piece (from an alt-weekly) cites con authoritative sources, and stokes conspiracy tones with “I might disappear for reporting this.” His second graf starts with “IMHO.” And his news peg is simply “some on social media are skeptical.” Link is pure opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586763518556135430
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28A18CF3B34A269C073B44AC7F9D343CA758F314B7E11917387EC711C8947289
  • createdAtMillis - 1667152098099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 158676351855613543028A18CF3B34A269C073B44AC7F9D343CA758F314B7E11917387EC711C8947289