Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-31 20:11:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B09FCDDE142DB8445F0F513C031660E1D942C35BEB09B1590608C79CC8ADBB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Katz has written a thorough refutation of Singal's claim that the screenshoted editorial is dishonest. Most notably he points out that Cotton himself uses 'protest' and 'riot' interchangeably, despite claiming at points that he only means 'illegal' protests. https://twitter.com/KatzOnEarth/status/1586481017497407488

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1586736022800502786
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B09FCDDE142DB8445F0F513C031660E1D942C35BEB09B1590608C79CC8ADBB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1667247099986
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15867360228005027865B09FCDDE142DB8445F0F513C031660E1D942C35BEB09B1590608C79CC8ADBB1