Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-28 04:47:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0703E7A789FB5FE3F16A46734E7F1B09312F3D6A9D0DD16C4D9C4980877FC9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The DOJ said the previous ban had no effect on crime. Meaning that a new one is not “anti crime” but just incompetent. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/204431.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1585685342924853249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0703E7A789FB5FE3F16A46734E7F1B09312F3D6A9D0DD16C4D9C4980877FC9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1666932450572
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1585685342924853249F0703E7A789FB5FE3F16A46734E7F1B09312F3D6A9D0DD16C4D9C4980877FC9B