Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-13 03:21:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 039FD70A3BE0D8C6694FE4E6D9C60C0EF48EC85A3E5E85A040379E33DEE27918
Participant Details

Original Note:

As archeologists have stated in replies, assigning sex to skeletal remains is not as simple as this post claims. Due to ambiguity, archeologists use 5 categories for likelihood of biological sex (not 2), and interpret likely gender from cultural artifacts found with remains. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43967044

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1580207318733443072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 039FD70A3BE0D8C6694FE4E6D9C60C0EF48EC85A3E5E85A040379E33DEE27918
  • createdAtMillis - 1665631301335
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1580207318733443072039FD70A3BE0D8C6694FE4E6D9C60C0EF48EC85A3E5E85A040379E33DEE27918