Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-08 15:52:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5926E5D40EA0EE16FE23941EADF05B78DEFDFD84D1DBEB3D7B9E250AA522B6DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point is not that they've never mentioned Carlson but that he isn't being given his due for his part in platforming this specific instance of hate speech. Past incidents aren't relevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1578737016694513665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5926E5D40EA0EE16FE23941EADF05B78DEFDFD84D1DBEB3D7B9E250AA522B6DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1665244331779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15787370166945136655926E5D40EA0EE16FE23941EADF05B78DEFDFD84D1DBEB3D7B9E250AA522B6DC