Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-04 02:08:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5CEF14263736DED04FB0F8A1D7FC4658C72DEE3C1FFBDE70154C7FD1B3EB6EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The vote in question wasn’t about FEMA funding. The FEMA money was just one part of a 63-page bill to continue previous authorizations. It’s unfair to assume that any “No” vote was about disaster aid. https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr6833/BILLS-117hr6833enr.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576986271330832392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5CEF14263736DED04FB0F8A1D7FC4658C72DEE3C1FFBDE70154C7FD1B3EB6EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1664849331460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1576986271330832392A5CEF14263736DED04FB0F8A1D7FC4658C72DEE3C1FFBDE70154C7FD1B3EB6EC