Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 20:05:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 413596086D399B1DD3EFC54EF47590E75BF0D57344AC93B9A02EF604C1CCA03A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The vote in question wasn’t about FEMA funding. The FEMA money was just one part of a 63-page bill to continue previous authorizations. It’s unfair to assume that any “No” vote was about disaster aid. https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr6833/BILLS-117hr6833enr.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576986271330832392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 413596086D399B1DD3EFC54EF47590E75BF0D57344AC93B9A02EF604C1CCA03A
  • createdAtMillis - 1679688338278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1576986271330832392413596086D399B1DD3EFC54EF47590E75BF0D57344AC93B9A02EF604C1CCA03A