Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-03 23:37:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 010F06F97825319FE4BBEFCA788CDEB60B8F5273C6CD695ACF3EBD06DABBD99A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The vote in question wasn’t about FEMA funding. The FEMA money was just one part of a 63-page bill to continue previous authorizations. It’s unfair to assume that any “No” vote was about disaster aid. https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr6833/BILLS-117hr6833enr.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576986271330832392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 010F06F97825319FE4BBEFCA788CDEB60B8F5273C6CD695ACF3EBD06DABBD99A
  • createdAtMillis - 1664840241089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1576986271330832392010F06F97825319FE4BBEFCA788CDEB60B8F5273C6CD695ACF3EBD06DABBD99A