Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-10-04 18:02:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FA24EB41A9BE008DA1272173C3C725F0889C07836259074C0926572BD1A3C22
Participant Details

Original Note:

Needs a better note. It's unclear if the high rated one means to support or debunk the tweet. If it's misleading, the note should specify what's wrong with the tweet. As is, it seems to back it up. I THINK the point is that this isn't a direct quote but note doesn't say so.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1576946917233270785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FA24EB41A9BE008DA1272173C3C725F0889C07836259074C0926572BD1A3C22
  • createdAtMillis - 1664906523097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15769469172332707853FA24EB41A9BE008DA1272173C3C725F0889C07836259074C0926572BD1A3C22