Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-09-11 06:37:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7275A13DA95798C5701054EE5B9B45EB7ADE5061A911FDDF05EE44E1AAD766EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. It may be some contributors' OPINION that this is irrelevant because this happened in 2020, or that "One should assess the company’s current actions without ascribing them to a former employee/manager," but Birdwatch notes are not the place for counterarguments. https://twitter.com/iridienne/status/1568660669016477696

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1568669980081770496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7275A13DA95798C5701054EE5B9B45EB7ADE5061A911FDDF05EE44E1AAD766EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1662878248571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15686699800817704967275A13DA95798C5701054EE5B9B45EB7ADE5061A911FDDF05EE44E1AAD766EB