Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-09-10 21:13:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. It may be some contributors' OPINION that this is irrelevant because this happened in 2020, or that "One should assess the company’s current actions without ascribing them to a former employee/manager," but Birdwatch notes are not the place for counterarguments. https://twitter.com/iridienne/status/1568660669016477696

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1568669980081770496
  • participantId - 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1662844428137
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15686699800817704960C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A