Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 14:02:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80CD8DACA8254EC352F9A6E73812C2DA7BFFB25BAF404A4D17F71E31EF9BFC8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the essays were written by historians and all were thouroughly referenced using historical scholarship. Some historians have critiqued some points made, but those too are supported by scholarly research. Those critiques have been overblown as a wholesale 'debunking.' https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/historians-clash-1619-project/604093/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1561473362509144066
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 80CD8DACA8254EC352F9A6E73812C2DA7BFFB25BAF404A4D17F71E31EF9BFC8F
createdAtMillis - 1661176938012
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 156147336250914406680CD8DACA8254EC352F9A6E73812C2DA7BFFB25BAF404A4D17F71E31EF9BFC8F