Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-08-22 06:12:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the essays were written by historians and all were thouroughly referenced using historical scholarship. Some historians have critiqued some points made, but those too are supported by scholarly research. Those critiques have been overblown as a wholesale 'debunking.' https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/historians-clash-1619-project/604093/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1561473362509144066
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
createdAtMillis - 1661148776206
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1561473362509144066676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745